The Supreme Court’s Chevron Doctrine Overhaul: What It Means for Employers

Photo of the united states supreme court exterior
By overturning Chevron, the Court has shifted more authority to judges. This decision is monumental for employers, offering a new avenue to challenge regulatory overreach. Here’s a breakdown of the ruling and its implications.

Share This Post

The recent Supreme Court ruling has sent shockwaves through the legal landscape, significantly altering the balance of power between federal regulators and the judiciary. By overturning Chevron, the Court has shifted more authority to judges, potentially reshaping workplace regulations for years to come.

This decision is monumental for employers, offering a new avenue to challenge regulatory overreach. Here’s a breakdown of the ruling and its implications.

The Supreme Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision overturned the Chevron doctrine, a legal principle that required courts to defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous laws. This ruling emerged from two cases where commercial fishing groups contested a federal agency’s authority to mandate that they cover the salaries of on-board observers. Lower courts upheld the agency’s rule under Chevron, but the Supreme Court’s new decision changed the game, emphasizing that courts must now exercise independent judgment in interpreting laws.

Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, criticized the Chevron doctrine for allowing agencies to change positions without explicit Congressional authorization, stating it distracts from the fundamental question: whether the statute allows the challenged agency action.

Understanding Chevron and Its Replacement

Since 1984, the Chevron doctrine provided a two-step framework for interpreting federal statutes:

  1. If a statute’s text is clear, it must be followed as written.
  2. If ambiguous, courts should defer to a reasonable agency interpretation.

This doctrine granted agencies considerable power, often leading to stable but expansive regulatory control, letting agency and industry experts fill in the legislative gaps. The new ruling eliminates this deference, requiring courts to independently decide if an agency has acted within its statutory authority when a law is ambiguous.

Implications for Employers

The end of Chevron deference means federal agencies will face more judicial scrutiny, potentially leading to the invalidation of various regulations. This shift allows employers to challenge agency actions more effectively, possibly reducing regulatory burdens. However, it also introduces uncertainty, as differing judicial interpretations could create a patchwork of compliance requirements across states.

Here are some regulatory areas likely to be affected:

  1. Wage and Hour Rules: Recent Department of Labor rules on overtime, tip pooling, and independent contractor classification might face challenges.
  2. Labor Law: The National Labor Relations Board’s pro-union actions, including “quickie” election rules and joint employer regulations, could be contested.
  3. Discrimination/Harassment: EEOC regulations under the ADEA and ADA may come under new scrutiny.
  4. Workplace Safety: OSHA’s electronic recordkeeping and walkthrough rules might be re-evaluated.
  5. Non-Competition Agreements: The FTC’s ban on most non-compete agreements could face legal challenges.
  6. Pay Equity: EEOC’s pay data reporting requirements might be revisited.
  7. Immigration: DHS regulations affecting employment-based immigration could be easier to challenge.
  8. Affirmative Action: OFCCP’s interpretations for federal contractors may be contested, questioning the broad scope of its regulations.

What Employers Should Do Next

To navigate this new legal environment, employers should:

  1. Anticipate Instability: Stay informed about ongoing legal challenges to administrative rules. Expect varied judicial interpretations across jurisdictions.
  2. Review Practices: Assess your policies to identify those based on administrative rules and consider if changes are needed.
  3. Reevaluate Litigation: Consult with legal counsel to revisit current litigation strategies in light of the new standard.
  4. Collaborate with Associations: Partner with industry groups to identify and challenge agency positions affecting your business.
  5. Monitor State Laws: Stay vigilant about state and local regulations, as they may become stricter in response to federal deregulatory trends.


This Supreme Court decision marks a significant shift in regulatory dynamics, empowering employers to contest federal agency actions while introducing a new era of legal uncertainty. Staying proactive and informed will be crucial in adapting to these changes.

For personalized guidance and expert advice on navigating these regulatory changes, contact me today to ensure your business stays compliant and ahead of the curve.

Picture of Bryan J. Driscoll

Bryan J. Driscoll

Bryan Driscoll is a non-practicing lawyer, seasoned HR consultant, and legal content writer specializing in innovative HR solutions and legal content. With over two decades of experience, he has contributed valuable insights to empower organizations and drive their growth and success.

More To Explore

Schedule a Consultation and Unlock Your Full Potential

Stay ahead with our expert insights!